Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally Tracy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Article's been heavily sourced since nomination so now meets GNG (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 00:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Sally Tracy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Questionably notable and improvable with its current version and the best search links I found was only this, this, this and this and unfortunately this article hasn't changed much since starting in June 2007. Notifying author Gillyweed, tagger LibStar and also DGG who likes to be informed of AfDs for this subject. SwisterTwister talk 07:21, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - I've added more references to show notability but it does need a good edit. I'll try and get to it over the next week. She has quite a few articles in The Conversation which are commissioned but as they are not comments from third parties I assume that they hold less sway. The Sydney Morning Herald quotes her quite regularly on any maternity related matter. Gillyweed (talk) 10:38, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. meets WP:PROF on 2 major criteria, author of a principal textbook in the field. Expert in her subject: Worldcat shows publications of hers with 232 (in BMJ), 108, etc. citations. Even in biomedicine, a2 papers with over 100 has always been considered sufficient (I consider the consensus has been that one such paper sufficient, but a few people at such discussions think it should be 2). As for GNG, meeting WP:PROF is explictly an alternative, but she probably meets the GNG also. We have in the past had considerable skepticism about articles on faculty in subjects traditionally dominated by women. I've been trying to fight this for eight years now, and it's time it were over. Maybe we can start restoring some of the articles about notable professors of home economics and nursing that were deleted in earlier years. DGG ( talk ) 16:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 23:48, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.